Skip to main content

From carsharing to mobility brokers?

I am excited by the prospect of urban 'mobility retailers' or 'mobility brokers'.  'Huh'? What is that, you ask?

A mobility broker is a business that handles the retailing, marketing and information end of your mobility needs. It may not even own any vehicles or employ any drivers (and you won't have to either). You could think of it as an urban transport travel agent. Such services would probably be most attractive for people who choose not have a car of their own. Because urban mobility is much more spontaneous and immediate than long-distance travel, mobility brokers will need to handle requests extremely nimbly in real time.

Most cities don't yet have such beasts in their urban transport landscape. Not yet.

But I think they will emerge out the innovative and vibrant ecosystem of handheld devices, real-time information apps, social media and networking, car-sharing companies, new payment systems, telematics, location-based services, etc. 

I thought mobility brokers were something for the future. But maybe at least one exists already!

Before I get to that, let me give a little background on why I think car-sharing seems central here, as the title of this post suggests.  I have long been intrigued by the promise of car-sharing. It may still be a niche service but it liberates our thinking. For example, the rise of car-sharing helps challenge lazy assumptions that aspirations for excellent mobility must mean mass car ownership.

Car-sharing is a service that makes it conceivable to have first class mobility without a car of your own. But it can't deliver on that promise alone. The next generation of car-sharing innovation is extremely promising but, as various people have noticed, to become a complete replacement for car ownership car-sharing needs to join forces with all of its natural allies, public transport, taxis, bicycle sharing, etc etc. And, of all of these allies, car-sharing companies seem to have an especially strong incentive to forge cooperation with the others.

And this takes us back towards the idea of mobility retailers or mobility brokers. One of my ongoing (but slow-motion!) research agendas involves looking into how we might accelerate the integration of all of these services.  In particular, what institutional changes in metropolitan mobility systems could best help this along? 

A slide from a presentation I gave last year in Kaohsiung*.

One key possibility involves that idea of 'mobility brokers'. It is not a totally new idea (more on the history some other time). But such data-intensive mobility-retailing enterprises have only recently become a much more realistic possibility for reasons that include advances in telematics and real-time urban mobility data sharing, the rise of smart phones, and the emergence of new social network-based spatial/mobility services such as ride-sharing and 'peer-to-peer car-sharing', etc.

As I said, I had been thinking about this as a future possibility. So I was very excited to see Michael Glotz-Richter write:
In the Netherlands, company carsharing provider Mobility Mixx (NL) saw the importance of the integration of carsharing and public transport. It expanded its offer to become a full-range mobility service provider, including carsharing, hire cars, public transport reservations, park and ride, trip advice and mobility budget management.
This sounds very much like the kind of ‘retailer’ or ‘mobility broker’ I have been thinking about. The Mobility Mixx site is in Dutch but a good idea of their offerings can be gleaned with the help of Google Translate.
Mobility Mixx has a unique combination of opportunities for business travel in the package. Besides the pool car and train at the location offers access to Mobility Mixx OV-bicycle (train) taxi, P + R parking, rental cars, the electronic processing of mileage claims and the management of personal mobility budgets. Travel advice from door to door - via Internet and call center - allows employees to choose and combine.  

Mobility Mixx seems to aim mainly at business clients for now:
Mobility Mixx offers unique in the Netherlands a total package for business mobility, which consists of a combination of pool car, train, taxi, public transport bike, regular taxi, and P & R car. The electronic processing of mileage claims and the management of personal mobility budgets is also possible. Mobility Mixx is day and night over the Internet and call center.

There is a lot more information on their website.

Does anyone have any direct experience with Mobility Mixx? Is my excitement warranted?  Do you know of any other nascent mobility brokers somewhere in the world? I would love to hear more.

*  CHARM in the slide is an acronym coined by Eric Britton in 1978 and developed further in 1989 (I said this line of thinking was not new!). It stands for Computer-Helped Area-Wide Regional Mobility System. Initially this referred mainly to dial-a-ride vehicle sharing for low-density areas. But something akin to the idea of mobility brokers is lurking there somewhere. 


Popular posts from this blog

Save Manila's (mostly informal) public transport!

Metro Manila depends on informal, lightly-regulated public transport which now faces a catastrophe as a result of this pandemic. The Mobility Coalition, an alliance of eight Metro Manila transport advocacy groups, has ideas on what to do. I spoke with Robie Siy who is active in the Mobility Coalition and who writes the weekly Mobility Matters column for the Manila Times.   [Scroll to the end for more details on Robie, Mobility Matters and the Mobility Alliance.] Scroll down for highlights of our conversation or listen with the player below. Click here to learn how to subscribe to this podcast.

Singapore Urban Transport: The Warts-and-All Story

Singapore's National Day is this week (9 August). So I decided to share Singapore's urban transport story - or my slightly  unusual take on it .  It is   a unique city in various ways but its urban transport policies are well worth your attention even if you don't live in Singapore. This is a warts-and-all version of the story, and it is my own view, not any kind of official one. It's also a little wonkish in parts. [Hi all you policy wonks!] But I hope to keep your interest with some surprising twists, such as: Why was the bus-only public transport system in an awful state by the early 1970s? If the buses were awful in early 1974, how was Singapore able to impose drastic increases to the cost of motoring in 1975? You will have guessed that the buses must have been drastically improved in 1974/75. But how was that achieved? Singapore urban transport enjoyed success through the 1980s and 1990s but its core social bargain (cars for the rich; decent but bas

Shaping public transport

If you care about promoting public transport, you need to understand the key choices about organising and regulating it. These choices shape the industry and they really matter. This is NOT just about privatisation versus government operation. It is more interesting than that. This edition of Reinventing Transport shares the key alternatives and gives a sense of what's at stake. The focus is buses but most of the ideas also apply more widely. Click here to learn how to subscribe to the podcast. You can either read the article below or listen to the podcast episode  (use a podcast app or the player at the beginning of this article or click HERE ) . This is just the basics, not a deep dive. If you want more gory details, then follow the links right at the end of the article. It may seem dull but bus regulation is important! [1:29] The regulatory framework sets how decisions get made and who makes those choices. It makes a huge difference for things you care about