Skip to main content

India's years of walking dangerously - a sobering video

Just how bad can walking environments get?

Answer: Very bad, as demonstrated in "Where are we to walk?" a 9 minute video from Pune in Maharashtra, India. 

Parisar explains who was behind the film:
The film was conceptualised and shot by Susan Michet, an American student intern during her time in Pune in May 2009. The Alliance for Global Education funded Susan's stay and work in Pune, Janwani provided the office space and infrastructure, while Parisar provided the inputs regarding the content of the film. We also acknowledge Hema Gadgil's contribution of her voice-over to the film.

After watching the film, do you have any ideas for our Indian friends? What can turn this around? Do you know of a city where things got this bad but which has since created a walkable city? Do you see redeeming features of Indian cities that offer some hope and which can part of the solution?

For more on (un)walkable cities in Asia (especially South Asia) see also:


  1. Dear Prof.,

    Most of the Indian cities are like this. To be honest, walking on the foot-path in most of the cities is, at times, more dangerous than walking on the road. You never know when you may find yourself in a pothole, or in a drain flowing underneath...

    As the video rightly points out, city planning authorities do not give priority to walkways into their agenda (neither in their discussions, nor in the plan document). Walkways are often lower in the list of public works, and not much attention is given to their construction.Often walkways are constructed to cover storm-water drains or for the purpose of covering the ditches/excavated pits for laying cables.

    At present, there is a nation wide urban renewal program (a Centrally sponsored scheme) under implementation, that covers 65 cities (with more than 1 million people). None of the cities in their plan document have mentioned walkways as a separate project or have given priority to foot-paths and walkways for urban pedestrians. Rather, a lot of emphasis is being given to adding capacities in terms of roads, inner-city lanes, road-repair and improvements, but hardly any emphasis on walkways and foot-paths.

    Great video..may I take the liberty to share with my friends.


    Kumar(MPP 2008-10)

  2. Thanks Kumar for the extra insight on Indian cities. All the best, Paul

  3. A great video. But unfortunately this covers a very well know problem which is very obvious to all Indians yet nothing is done. Privatization offers the only glimmer of home in building good public infrastructure. In a country that is riddled by too much corruption, honestly it is hurculean effort to mend the pedestrian infrastructure. Again, a great video which I will post on facebook to share among friends.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Save Manila's (mostly informal) public transport!

Metro Manila depends on informal, lightly-regulated public transport which now faces a catastrophe as a result of this pandemic. The Mobility Coalition, an alliance of eight Metro Manila transport advocacy groups, has ideas on what to do. I spoke with Robie Siy who is active in the Mobility Coalition and who writes the weekly Mobility Matters column for the Manila Times.   [Scroll to the end for more details on Robie, Mobility Matters and the Mobility Alliance.] Scroll down for highlights of our conversation or listen with the player below. Click here to learn how to subscribe to this podcast.

Singapore Urban Transport: The Warts-and-All Story

Singapore's National Day is this week (9 August). So I decided to share Singapore's urban transport story - or my slightly  unusual take on it .  It is   a unique city in various ways but its urban transport policies are well worth your attention even if you don't live in Singapore. This is a warts-and-all version of the story, and it is my own view, not any kind of official one. It's also a little wonkish in parts. [Hi all you policy wonks!] But I hope to keep your interest with some surprising twists, such as: Why was the bus-only public transport system in an awful state by the early 1970s? If the buses were awful in early 1974, how was Singapore able to impose drastic increases to the cost of motoring in 1975? You will have guessed that the buses must have been drastically improved in 1974/75. But how was that achieved? Singapore urban transport enjoyed success through the 1980s and 1990s but its core social bargain (cars for the rich; decent but bas

Shaping public transport

If you care about promoting public transport, you need to understand the key choices about organising and regulating it. These choices shape the industry and they really matter. This is NOT just about privatisation versus government operation. It is more interesting than that. This edition of Reinventing Transport shares the key alternatives and gives a sense of what's at stake. The focus is buses but most of the ideas also apply more widely. Click here to learn how to subscribe to the podcast. You can either read the article below or listen to the podcast episode  (use a podcast app or the player at the beginning of this article or click HERE ) . This is just the basics, not a deep dive. If you want more gory details, then follow the links right at the end of the article. It may seem dull but bus regulation is important! [1:29] The regulatory framework sets how decisions get made and who makes those choices. It makes a huge difference for things you care about